Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 7690/18, 9348/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,31657) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
McGILL AND HEWITT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11
LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 7690/18
19/11 and 36395/11, 22 May 2012 the Court considered that an application for such exceptional permission did not allow the six-month time-limit to be extended. - EGMR, 10.07.2017 - 71537/14
HARKINS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 7690/18
In Harkins v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], no. 71537/14, § 56, 15 June 2017 the Court reaffirmed that "legal certainty constitutes one of the fundamental elements of the rule of law which requires, inter alia, that, where a court has finally determined an issue, its ruling should not be called into question". - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 7690/18
Consequently, it has adopted a "rigorous approach" in applying those admissibility criteria, such as the six-month rule, whose object and purpose is to serve the interests of legal certainty and mark out the limits of its competence (Harkins, cited above, § 54; see also Sabri Güne??, cited above, §§ 39-42 and Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I ), and, in respect of Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention, it has held that a development in its own jurisprudence did not constitute "relevant new information", since, if jurisprudential developments were to permit unsuccessful applicants to reintroduce their complaints, final judgments would continually be called into question by the lodging of fresh applications (Harkins, cited above, § 56).