Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

  RAMKOVSKI v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Lastly, it is noteworthy that in previous cases against the respondent State concerning complaints lodged under Article 5 § 3 (see Vasilkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 28169/08, 28 October 2010; Miladinov and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 46398/09 and 2 others, 50570/09 and 50576/09, 24 April 2014; and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, 8 February 2018) the Government did not argue that a compensation claim was an effective remedy for the purposes of that provision.

  The Court has previously found such delays to be excessive (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016, and contrast Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 75, 8 February 2018).

• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 73329/16

  HASSELBAINK v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  The Court reiterates that only a reasoned decision by the judicial authorities can effectively demonstrate to the parties that they have been heard and make appeals and public scrutiny of the administration of justice possible (see Hasselbaink v. the Netherlands, no. 73329/16, § 77, 9 February 2021).
• EGMR, 21.02.2023 - 52048/16

  HYSA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  However, other than a formal statement to that effect, the panel did not provide any specific reasons for this conclusion (see, similarly, Hysa v. Albania, no. 52048/16, § 76, 21 February 2023) based on the applicant's personal circumstances.

 
• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 28169/08

  VASILKOSKI AND OTHERS v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Lastly, it is noteworthy that in previous cases against the respondent State concerning complaints lodged under Article 5 § 3 (see Vasilkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 28169/08, 28 October 2010; Miladinov and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 46398/09 and 2 others, 50570/09 and 50576/09, 24 April 2014; and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, 8 February 2018) the Government did not argue that a compensation claim was an effective remedy for the purposes of that provision.
• EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 5432/15

  UGULAVA v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  By overturning the rule enshrined in Article 5 of the Convention, a provision which makes detention an exceptional departure from the right to liberty and one that is only permissible in exhaustively enumerated and strictly defined cases, the court shifted the burden of proof to the applicant (see Ugulava v. Georgia, no. 5432/15, § 111, 9 February 2023).
• EGMR - 50933/18 (anhängig)

  MELNYK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Furthermore, they did not include an appropriate assessment of the continued justification for the applicant's house arrest despite the passage of time (see Vadym Melnyk v. Ukraine, nos. 62209/17 and 50933/18, § 112, 15 September 2022).
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  ELMAZOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Elmazova and Others v. North Macedonia, nos. 11811/20 and 13550/20, § 86, 13 December 2022).
• EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 42296/09

  KOVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  42296/09 and 4 others, §§ 82-84, 16 November 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 43674/16

  RADONJIC AND ROMIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  The relevant general principles have recently been summarised in Radonjic and Romic v. Serbia (no. 43674/16, §§ 62-70, 4 April 2023).
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07

  SNYATOVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  The Court has previously found such delays to be excessive (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016, and contrast Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 75, 8 February 2018).
• EGMR, 26.03.2019 - 56998/16

  VELECKA AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 51249/11

  ORAVEC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 6858/11

  DELIJORGJI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 21786/15

  LAKATOS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 47156/16

  KLINKEL v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 77805/14

  SHIPOVIKJ v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 77796/17

  TALESKI AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 76695/11

  UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA