Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MACHINA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MACHINA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 69086/14

  The Court has frequently held that the obligation to investigate, which stems from Articles 1 and 3 of the Convention, "is not an obligation of results, but of means" (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II).

• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 40926/16

  LYPOVCHENKO AND HALABUDENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  In respect of medical assistance, the Court notes the various medical conditions diagnosed by the de facto "MRT authorities" themselves and the absence of any evidence that treatment was administered for them - in particular for hepatitis C (see paragraphs 23-28 above; see also Machina v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69086/14, §§ 49-50, 17 January 2023).
• EGMR - 54792/21 (anhängig)

  JURCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA and 3 other applications

  (a) Considering their medical condition, have the Government met their obligation to ensure that the applicants' health and well-being are being adequately secured by providing them with the requisite medical assistance as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-40, 23 March 2016; Machina v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69086/14, §§ 48-49, 17 January 2023; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, §§ 150-153, 25 June 2013; and Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204/07, §§ 74-77 and 86, 3 March 2009)?.

  54792/21 and 27439/22 do the domestic authorities bear responsibility under the Convention for the applicant's contamination with various hepatitis viruses (see Machina v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69086/14, §§ 30 and 36-44, 17 January 2023)?.

• EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 23151/09

  TALAMBUTA ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  69086/14.
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 2621/21

  RUS c. ROUMANIE

  Il en découle que le requérant ne saurait être considéré exonéré de son obligation de tenter une action en responsabilité civile délictuelle car il n'est pas établi que l'infection dont il a été victime était le résultat d'un dysfonctionnement structurel (voir, mutatis mutandis, Jeladze c. Géorgie, no £a href="http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=1871/08" title="1871/08 (2 zugeordnete Entscheidungen)">1871/08, § 35, 18 décembre 2012) ou d'une négligence ou d'un acte intentionnel d'un agent de l'État qui ne serait pas susceptible de réparation par le simple octroi d'une compensation pécuniaire à la victime (voir, a contrario, Machina c. République de Moldova, no 69086/14, § 26, 17 janvier 2023).