Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAJIZADE AND ABDULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above (see paragraphs 45 and 57), the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the applicants' complaint under Article 10 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04

  NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  The Court has previously held, in examining the fairness of criminal proceedings, that by ignoring a specific, pertinent and important point made by the accused, domestic courts fall short of their obligations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 280, 21 April 2011, and Karimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 24219/16 and 2 others, § 30, 22 July 2021).
• EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8460/07

  PIRALI ORUJOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  The Court has established that there is no effective remedy in Azerbaijan in respect of statements made by domestic authorities concerning an applicant's right to the presumption of innocence (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 50-58, 3 February 2011).

 
• EGMR, 23.02.2023 - 22323/16

  RUSTAMZADE v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  In view of the above findings, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the remainder of the applicants' grievances under this heading (set out in paragraph 47 above, and compare Rustamzade v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 22323/16, § 44, 23 February 2023).
• EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 24219/16

  KARIMOV ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  The Court has previously held, in examining the fairness of criminal proceedings, that by ignoring a specific, pertinent and important point made by the accused, domestic courts fall short of their obligations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 280, 21 April 2011, and Karimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 24219/16 and 2 others, § 30, 22 July 2021).
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  Having regard to the above finding, the Court does not consider it necessary in the present case to examine separately, under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, whether the judicial hearings concerning the applicants' continued pre-trial detention were unfair (see Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, § 525, 25 July 2013).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 919/15

  ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that the domestic courts' conclusion that the witnesses who had testified in the applicants' favour were untruthful and biased towards the applicants was made without sufficient reasons and without due regard to their individual situations (compare Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 919/15, § 227, 16 November 2017).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, 9 November 2010) and Isayeva v. Azerbaijan (no. 36229/11, 25 June 2015), the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  In these circumstances, the Court considers that, within the meaning of its case-law, the above-mentioned evidence objectively linked the applicants to the alleged criminal offences and was sufficient to have created a "reasonable suspicion" against them (see Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 45, 20 February 2014, and Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, § 77, 6 December 2011).
• EGMR, 25.06.2015 - 36229/11

  ISAYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, 9 November 2010) and Isayeva v. Azerbaijan (no. 36229/11, 25 June 2015), the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06

  RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 67414/11

  CUPIAL v. POLAND
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 48653/13

  RASHAD HASANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN