Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,64115) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDRYSIAK v. POLAND
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06
The Court reiterates that any "interference by a public authority" with the right to respect for correspondence will contravene Article 8 of the Convention unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article and is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve them (see, among many other authorities, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34, and Niedbala v. Poland no. 27915/95, § 78). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06
Any relevance the latter judgment might have to the present case is therefore reduced by the fact that it was delivered after the relevant time (see, for example, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX; Lewak v. Poland, no. 21890/03, § 22-25, 6 September 2007). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06
The Court reiterates that any "interference by a public authority" with the right to respect for correspondence will contravene Article 8 of the Convention unless it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article and is "necessary in a democratic society" in order to achieve them (see, among many other authorities, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34, and Niedbala v. Poland no. 27915/95, § 78). - EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 21890/03
LEWAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 31038/06
Any relevance the latter judgment might have to the present case is therefore reduced by the fact that it was delivered after the relevant time (see, for example, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX; Lewak v. Poland, no. 21890/03, § 22-25, 6 September 2007).