Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RF SPOL. S R.O. v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 9926/03

  In the light of the above considerations the Court finds no special circumstances relating to respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require it to continue the examination of the application in respect of RFSRO (for contrast see, for example, Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX, and Tehrani and Others v. Turkey, nos. 32940/08, 41626/08 and 43616/08, § 56, 13 April 2010).
• EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 49429/99

  CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 9926/03

  While it is true that the claim determined in the impugned proceedings was pecuniary in nature and as such transferable, and that it was in fact later transferred to a third private entity, the Court observes that there was no connection between the impugned proceedings and the legal collapse of RFSRO (for contrast see, for example, OAO Neftyanaya kompaniya YUKOS, cited above, § 443 and Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429/99, § 80, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.04.2010 - 32940/08

  TEHRANI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2010 - 9926/03

  In the light of the above considerations the Court finds no special circumstances relating to respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require it to continue the examination of the application in respect of RFSRO (for contrast see, for example, Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX, and Tehrani and Others v. Turkey, nos. 32940/08, 41626/08 and 43616/08, § 56, 13 April 2010).

• EGMR, 12.07.2023 - 1828/06

  G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  La Cour note que, dans la plupart des cas où la société requérante avait disparu, elle a décidé de ne pas rayer du rôle la requête (Capital Bank AD c. Bulgarie, précité, Schweizerische Radio- und Fernsehgesellschaft et publisuisse SA c. Suisse, no 41723/14, § 43, 22 décembre 2020 ; a contrario, RF SPOL. S R.O. c. Slovaquie, déc., no 9926/03, 20 octobre 2010) et ce notamment lorsque la personne physique ou morale qui avait succédé à une société requérante l'avait informée de sa volonté de maintenir la requête (Aviakompaniya A.T.I., ZAT, précité, § 22, Euromak Metal Doo c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, § 33, Timakov et OOO ID Rubezh, § 17).
• EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 39070/11

  SPALLDI D.O.O. v. CROATIA

  Human rights cases before the Court generally also have a moral dimension, which it must take into account when considering whether to continue with the examination of an application after the applicant has ceased to exist (see RF SPOL. S R.O. v. Slovakia, (dec.), 9926/03, 20 October 2010).
• EGMR, 18.06.2019 - 50520/15

  DOO VIO-MARK-IN INSOLVENCY v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  The Court is aware that, in view of the applicant company having been struck off the registry of companies, there may be an issue with regard to its standing before the Court (see RF spol. s.r.o. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 9926/03, 20 October 2010, and compare Aviakompaniya A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine, no. 1006/07, § 23, 5 October 2017).