Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 80152/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,28554) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DRAGI PETROVIC v. SERBIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11
Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 80152/12
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on false information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; and S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 67, ECHR 2014) or if significant information and documents were deliberately omitted, either where they were known from the outset or where new significant developments occurred during the proceedings (see Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; and Tatalovic and Dekic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 15433/07, 29 May 2012). - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03
PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 80152/12
The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on false information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; and S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 67, ECHR 2014) or if significant information and documents were deliberately omitted, either where they were known from the outset or where new significant developments occurred during the proceedings (see Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; and Tatalovic and Dekic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 15433/07, 29 May 2012). - EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 75381/10
KOMATINOVIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 80152/12
Incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information in question concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Predescu, cited above, §§ 25-26; and Komatinovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013).