Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AKHMATOVA v. RUSSIA

  (französisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 22596/04

  Thus, a hearing may be dispensed with if a party unequivocally waives his or her right thereto and there are no questions of public interest making a hearing necessary (see, among other authorities, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 22596/04

  Thus, a hearing may be dispensed with if a party unequivocally waives his or her right thereto and there are no questions of public interest making a hearing necessary (see, among other authorities, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 22596/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 22596/04

  At the same time, the Court reiterates that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by the national law in defence of his interests (see, mutatis mutandis, YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 66, Series A no. 319-A).
• EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77

  Buchholz ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 22596/04

  Regarding what was at stake for the applicant, the Court observes that the applicant's claims concerned the subject of employment, which required particular diligence on the part of the domestic authorities (see, among many other authorities, Buchholz v. Germany, 6 May 1981, § 597, Series A no. 42).

• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 44099/04

  FATEYENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to those special circumstances and the Court's case-law, while considering these complaints admissible, the Court does not find it necessary to continue their separate examination (see, among many authorities, Palacheva, cited above, §§ 71-75; Akhmatova v. Russia, no. 22596/04, §§ 62-66, 21 October 2010; and Pobudilina and Others v. Russia (dec.), nos.