Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FRENDO RANDON AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Just satisfaction - reserved (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Frendo Randon and Others v. Malta

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2226/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 guarantees, in substance, the right to property and comprises three distinct rules (see, for example, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 61, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

  AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  They must be construed in the light of the general principle laid down in the first rule (see, for example, Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, 5 May 1995, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 316-A).
• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  It reiterates that while deprivation of property effected for no reason other than to confer a private benefit on a private party cannot be "in the public interest", the compulsory transfer of property from one individual to another may, depending on the circumstances, constitute a legitimate means of promoting the public interest (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 40, Series A no. 98).

 
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 74258/01

  URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  Legitimate objectives in the "public interest", such as those pursued in measures of economic reform or measures designed to achieve greater social justice, may call for less than reimbursement of the full market value (see Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, § 115, ECHR 2007-XIII).
• EGMR, 10.09.2014 - 37546/02

  KEÇECIOGLU AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  A similar situation obtained in the cases of KeçecioÄ?lu and Others v. Turkey (no. 37546/02, §§ 28-29, 8 April 2008) and Motais de Narbonne v. France (no. 48161/99, § 19, 2 July 2002).
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 38244/03

  ABDILLA v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  Nevertheless, in the exercise of its power of review the Court must determine whether the requisite balance was maintained in a manner consonant with the individual's right of property (see Abdilla v. Malta (dec.), no 38244/03, 3 November 2005).
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 26771/07

  GERA DE PETRI TESTAFERRATA BONICI GHAXAQ AGAINST MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2226/10

  The Court reiterates that an applicant is deprived of his or her status as a victim if the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded appropriate and sufficient redress for, a breach of the Convention (see, for example, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-193, ECHR 2006-V, and Gera de Petri Testaferrata Bonici Ghaxaq v. Malta, no. 26771/07, § 50, 5 April 2011).