Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13665/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55303) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OBRIST v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13665/09
However, a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him of his status as a victim, unless the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006-V and Mitterbauer v. Austria (dec.), no. 2027/06, 12 February 2009). - EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 2027/06
MITTERBAUER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13665/09
However, a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him of his status as a victim, unless the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006-V and Mitterbauer v. Austria (dec.), no. 2027/06, 12 February 2009).