Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,32456
EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.06.2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. Juni 2016 - 52166/08, 8526/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,32456)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,32456) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (23)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    However, it is only exceptionally that a violation, by its very nature, does not leave any real choice as to the measures required to remedy it (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

    BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Moreover, such means would frequently be preferable to the reopening of proceedings in view of other equally important considerations, such as the principle of legal certainty, respect of res judicata or the interests of bona fide third parties (see Almeida Santos, cited above, § 12; and Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 57, ECHR 2015).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning a violation of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of a final domestic judgment by way of the supervisory review procedure (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), it has continued to find similar violations on account of the same structural deficiency.
     
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

    COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    The Court may then decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    To this end, the Court has examined the Government's declaration carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11

    KUDESHKINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    This is particularly true in civil cases where the Contracting States dispose of a variety of means to ensure redress to an aggrieved party (see Kudeshkina (no. 2) v. Russia (dec.), no. 28727/11, § 77, 17 February 2014).
  • EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 21506/08

    GOLUBOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Those considerations would in particular prevail over an applicant's interest in having proceedings reopened when the violation of the Convention results from a general problem generating repetitive applications rather than from the specific circumstances of an individual case (see Davydov, cited above, § 29; Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 64, 30 November 2010; Golubowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 21506/08, 5 July 2011; and, by contrast and compare with Miroslaw Garlicki v. Poland, no. 36921/07, § 154, 14 June 2011).
  • EGMR, 29.07.2010 - 8549/06

    STRELTSOV AND OTHER

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Thus, considering the Government's offer as a whole and having particular regard to the sum proposed in respect of non-pecuniary damage (compare and contrast with Ryabov and 151 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 4563/07 and 151 others., § 23, 17 December 2009, and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 and 86 others, § 96, 29 July 2010), the Court finds no reason to consider that the compensation offered to Mr Ryabkin constitutes inadequate or otherwise unreasonable redress for the violations of his Convention rights.
  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 38767/07

    SARIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    In any event, it has not been demonstrated that the reopening of proceedings would lead to a result substantially different from what the Government have undertaken to pay in terms of compensation (compare and contrast Saric and Others v. Croatia, nos. 38767/07 and 24 others, § 28, 18 October 2011).
  • EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4563/07

    RYABOV AND OTHER "PRIVILEGED PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 52166/08
    Thus, considering the Government's offer as a whole and having particular regard to the sum proposed in respect of non-pecuniary damage (compare and contrast with Ryabov and 151 other "Privileged pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 4563/07 and 151 others., § 23, 17 December 2009, and Streltsov and other "Novocherkassk military pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 8549/06 and 86 others, § 96, 29 July 2010), the Court finds no reason to consider that the compensation offered to Mr Ryabkin constitutes inadequate or otherwise unreasonable redress for the violations of his Convention rights.
  • EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 30351/06

    VLASOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS

  • EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 30432/06

    SAYGANOV v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS

  • EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 14962/15

    ISAGOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, 1granov and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 42513/19

    GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, and Igranov and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57347/19

    ABDULLAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    52166/08 and 8526/09, §§ 49-50, 28 June 2016, and Igranov and Others v. Russia, nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht