Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 29229/22 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KURUOVÁ AND HORVÁTHOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 29229/22
If so, having regard to such protection (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV), was the investigation by the domestic authorities into those allegations in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid, cited above, §§ 114-23), including but not only the aspect of independence (see, mutatis mutandis, Mizigárová v. Slovakia, no. 74832/01, §§ 98-100, 14 December 2010; Eremiásová and Pechová v. the Czech Republic, no. 23944/04, § 151-60, 16 February 2012, with further references; Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, §§ 83-88, 25 July 2013; and Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, § 225, 14 April 2015)?. - EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 655/16
LAKATOSOVÁ AND LAKATOS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 29229/22
In particular, did the domestic authorities have before them information that was sufficient to bring into play their additional duty to take all reasonable steps to unmask any racist motive and to establish whether or not ethnic hatred or prejudice may have played a role in their alleged ill-treatment (see, a contrario, Adam v. Slovakia, no. 68066/12, § 94, 26 July 2016, with further references and, mutatis mutandis, Lakatosová and Lakatos v. Slovakia, no. 655/16, § 75, 11 December 2018)? If so, did they take such steps?.