Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 54825/18 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ROMANENKO v. UKRAINE
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 1128/17
Meng ./. Deutschland - Konventionsverletzung durch Beteiligung eines nicht …
Auszug aus EGMR - 54825/18
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charge against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, in view of the rulings of the Kirovskyi District Court of Dnipropetrovsk of 17 March 2015, 29 July and 13 December 2016, was that court impartial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Meng v. Germany, no. 1128/17, §§ 42-52, 16 February 2021)?. - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 54825/18
Having regard to the procedural protection from torture or inhuman and degrading treatment (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV and Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 169-182, 15 May 2012), was the investigation of the applicant's complaints of ill-treatment by the domestic authorities compatible with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention?. - EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 23893/03
KAVERZIN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 54825/18
Having regard to the procedural protection from torture or inhuman and degrading treatment (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV and Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 169-182, 15 May 2012), was the investigation of the applicant's complaints of ill-treatment by the domestic authorities compatible with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention?.