Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2023,22217
EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21 (https://dejure.org/2023,22217)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.09.2023 - 31434/21 (https://dejure.org/2023,22217)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. September 2023 - 31434/21 (https://dejure.org/2023,22217)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,22217) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

    SALEM v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

    The Court considers it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law" and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

  • EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 40601/05

    Rechtssache M. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).
  • EGMR, 27.10.2005 - 32231/02

    Ausweisung, Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention,

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).
  • EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

    BALOGUN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    One of the elements relied on in this respect has been whether the offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a nature that the person in question posed a serious threat to public order (see, among other authorities, Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 34 13 February 2001; Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, § 59, 27 October 2005; and Bousarra v. France, no. 25672/07, § 53, 23 September 2010, in which the Court found that the persons in question did not pose a serious threat to public order; see also Mutlag v. Germany, no. 40601/05, §§ 61-62, 25 March 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012, in which the Court found that the person in question did pose a serious threat to public order).
  • EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

    MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).
  • EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 41643/19

    ABDI v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21
    The offence was of such a nature that it could have had serious consequences for the lives of others (see, for example, Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, § 33, 14 September 2021, and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 32739/21

    PAYAM v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 54157/21

    KURLAND v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 678.21

    Visumserteilung zum Familiennachzug: Feststellung des Bestehens einer Ehe durch

    Zu berücksichtigen sei überdies, ob das Familienleben zu einer Zeit begründet wurde, zu der den beteiligten Personen bekannt war, dass die Aufnahme wegen des Aufenthaltsstatus des Stammberechtigten von Beginn an unsicher war (BVerwG, Urteil vom 27. April 2021 - BVerwG 1 C 45/20 -, NVwZ-RR 2021, 777 [778] Rn. 18 m. w. N.; jüngst EGMR, Entscheidung vom 5. September 2023 - 31434/21 [Sharifi v. Denmark] -, abrufbar unter https://laweuro.com/?p=21042, Rn. 31).
  • VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 618.21

    Visumserteilung zum Zwecke des Familiennachzugs: Voraussetzungen eines

    Zu berücksichtigen sei überdies, ob das Familienleben zu einer Zeit begründet wurde, zu der den beteiligten Personen bekannt war, dass die Aufnahme wegen des Aufenthaltsstatus des Stammberechtigten von Beginn an unsicher war (BVerwG, Urteil vom 27. April 2021 - BVerwG 1 C 45.20 -, NVwZ-RR 2021, 777 [778] Rn. 18 m. w. N.; jüngst EGMR, Entscheidung vom 5. September 2023 - 31434/21 [Sharifi v. Denmark] -, abrufbar unter https://laweuro.com/?p=21042, Rn. 31).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 2116/21

    NGUYEN v. DENMARK

    The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when assessing the applicant's case (see Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, § 25, 5 September 2023, and Sharifi v. Denmark, no.31434/21, § 2, 5 September 2023).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 11093/22

    DAVUD KIBAR v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 19866/21

    SARAC v. DENMARK

    The Court is therefore called upon to examine whether "very serious reasons" of that kind were adequately adduced and examined by the national authorities when assessing the applicant's case (see Noorzae, cited above, § 25 and Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, § 25, 5 September 2023).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 21783/22

    CAKMAK v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 60766/19

    FATEH v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 61126/19

    BELGACEM v. DENMARK

    It also notes the recent cases against Denmark concerning expulsion of settled immigrants (see, among others, Noorzae v. Denmark, no. 44810/20, 5 September 2023; Sharifi v. Denmark, no. 31434/21, 5 September 2023; Al-Masudi v. Denmark, no. 35740/21, 5 September 2023; Avci v. Denmark, no. 40240/19, 30 November 2021; Abdi v. Denmark, no. 41643/19, 14 September 2021; Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, 22 March 2022; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, 1 February 2022; and Hussain v. Denmark (dec.), [Committee], no. 31572/19, 22 February 2022).
  • VG Berlin, 27.09.2023 - 38 K 897.21

    Visumserteilung zum Familiennachzug: Ausnahme von dem Regelausschlussgrund bei

  • EGMR - 38589/23 (anhängig)

    QUASIMI v. DENMARK

  • EGMR - 2852/24 (anhängig)

    MIARI v. DENMARK

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht