Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06, 56443/09, 25147/14 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GORLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (70) Neu Zitiert selbst (13)
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04
KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
Whilst detention, like any other measure depriving a person of his or her liberty, entails various limitations of his or her rights and freedoms, that person does not forfeit his or her Convention rights merely because of his or her status as a detainee, including the rights guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, so that restrictions on those rights must be justified in each case (see Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 106 and 116-17, ECHR 2015, and the authorities cited therein).Yet, as the Court itself mentions in paragraph 81 of the instant judgment, it is a well-established principle "that prisoners in general continue to enjoy all the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Convention save for the right to liberty, where lawfully imposed detention expressly falls within the scope of Article 5 of the Convention (see Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, § 69, ECHR 2005-IX)." In other words, an individual in detention "does not forfeit his or her Convention rights merely because of his or her status as a detainee, including the rights guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, so that restrictions on those rights must be justified in each case (Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 106 and 116-17, ECHR 2015, and the authorities cited therein)." Thus, the right to respect for the private life of such applicants should not be treated any differently from that of those outside the prison system.
- EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 62617/00
Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte schützt private Nutzung des Internets
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The failure to make an award for non-pecuniary damage also contradicts numerous judgments of this Court in which surveillance activities taking place outside a clear and comprehensive legal framework led to a finding a violation of Article 8 and an award for non-pecuniary damage (see Vukota-Bojic v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, §§ 73-77, 105, ECHR 2016; Valentino Acatrinei v. Romania, no. 18540/04, §§ 61, 96, ECHR 2013; Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617/00, §§ 45-49, 53-55, ECHR 2007; and Halford v. the United Kingdom, no. 20605/92, § 75, ECHR 1997). - EGMR, 25.06.1997 - 20605/92
HALFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The failure to make an award for non-pecuniary damage also contradicts numerous judgments of this Court in which surveillance activities taking place outside a clear and comprehensive legal framework led to a finding a violation of Article 8 and an award for non-pecuniary damage (see Vukota-Bojic v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, §§ 73-77, 105, ECHR 2016; Valentino Acatrinei v. Romania, no. 18540/04, §§ 61, 96, ECHR 2013; Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617/00, §§ 45-49, 53-55, ECHR 2007; and Halford v. the United Kingdom, no. 20605/92, § 75, ECHR 1997).
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 54335/14
GAFÀ v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The problem of the Article 41 wording was previously discussed in a dissenting opinion in Nikolova v Bulgaria [GC] (no. 31195/96, ECHR 1999-II), as well as in Gafà v. Malta (no. 54335/14, ECHR 2018). - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04
S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The Court recalls that the domestic law must also afford adequate guarantees that retained personal data are efficiently protected from misuse and abuse (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 103, ECHR 2008). - EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 37138/14
Ungarns Anti-Terror-Gesetz ist menschenrechtswidrig
- EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The Court accepts that it is difficult to attain absolute certainty in the framing of laws, and that the need to avoid excessive rigidity and to keep pace with changing circumstances means that many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague (see Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, § 88, Series A no. 61). - EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83
NORRIS c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
In such circumstances, the Court considers that the finding of a violation, with the consequences which will ensue for the future, constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present case for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants (compare Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, § 50, Series A no. 142; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI, and S. and Marper [GC], cited above, § 134). - EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 39288/98
EKIN ASSOCIATION v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
The criterion of foreseeability cannot be interpreted as requiring that all detailed conditions and procedures governing the interference be laid down in the substantive law itself, and the requirements of "lawfulness" can be met if points which cannot be satisfactorily resolved on the basis of substantive law are set out in enactments of lower rank than statutes (ibid., §§ 88-89 and 93-94; Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Lebois v. Bulgaria, no. 67482/14, § 66, 19 October 2017). - EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08
GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 27057/06
60041/08 and 60054/08, §§ 90-92, ECHR 2010 (extracts); and Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, § 93, 12 January 2016). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
- EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 67482/14
LEBOIS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 45337/19
VANYUTA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect). - EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 58032/19
SUNTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect). - EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 47699/19
KHATYPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court has already established, in an earlier case against Russia, that the national legal framework governing the placement of detainees under permanent video surveillance in penal institutions falls short of the standards set out in Article 8 of the Convention (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia (nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).
- EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 40792/10
Russland will sich EGMR-Urteil widersetzen: Keine Kompromisse bei …
27057/06 and 2 others, § 120, 2 July 2019). - EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 36904/19
BUTYANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, as to the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities and lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 28355/18
ZAVGORODNIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC] (nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), Idalov v. Russia [GC] (no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012), Gorlov and Others v. Russia (nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019). - EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 12166/19
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, §§ 58-110, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; and Pavlova v. Russia, no. 8578/12, §§ 21-33, 18 February 2020, concerning restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect. - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 42771/19
YEMANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC] (nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), Idalov v. Russia [GC] (no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012), Gorlov and Others v. Russia (nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019), Polyakova and Others v. Russia (nos. 35090/09 and 3 others, 7 March 2017), Shlykov and Others v. Russia (nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, 19 January 2021). - EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 26285/19
DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees). - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 37564/19
MOROZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees). - EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 45302/19
BURTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 8461/20
GORBENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 1510/21
ASADULLAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 28279/21
SLIVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 2634/17 (anhängig)
MOROZOV v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications
- EGMR - 46807/18 (anhängig)
GADZHIYEV v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 18907/19
TIKHONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 41539/18
GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 38217/19
MELNIK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 13050/17
RUDIK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 57882/18
MIKHAYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 21514/18
ZATYNAYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41071/18
TINGAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 27284/17
KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 13567/13
BURKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 10881/21
SOLDATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 12205/18
PONOMAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 1698/19
BOCHKAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 33236/18
PUKHTVENT AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 19090/20
FENECH v. MALTA
- EGMR - 74141/10 (anhängig)
IZMESTYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 41090/18
RESIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 3219/19
FILIMONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 51892/19
CHERNOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 11590/17
CHASHCHUKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06
URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 19753/18
ZUBAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 14228/18
PANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 25056/14
FAZIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 51678/15
PETERMAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 25658/19
BANEVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 15304/19
YELISEYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 74497/17
BOCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 57747/10
YUMININ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 30389/19
GOLOVACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 48796/18
SAFRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 33803/19
NAM AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 33771/16
KORABLEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 25692/19
GOROKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 10142/19
LEVINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.04.2021 - 3494/17
ZOKIROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 49321/18
PRONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 24847/20
BOYKO-VELIKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 32695/14
TYURIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 7427/18
RADEYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 36533/18
KUVSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 33826/17
GARKOVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 52727/19
SHMONIN AND YEFREMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 26363/18
ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR - 23325/22 (anhängig)
AMEEN v. PORTUGAL and 3 other applications
- EGMR - 3215/20 (anhängig)
NURLYGAYANOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
- EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 76451/17
KARIMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 2051/18
TARATUNIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 41563/18
KUZMIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 22911/18
STEPANISHCHEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 32992/13
SOVETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 57636/16
DILSHNAYDER AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 20285/21
PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.07.2022 - 83036/17
TSAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 45508/13
YUDIN v. RUSSIA