Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14746) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
H.A. AND H.A. v. NORWAY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07
Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16
The Court must be satisfied, however, that the assessment made by the authorities of the Contracting State is adequate and sufficiently supported by domestic materials as well as by materials originating from other reliable and objective sources such as, for instance, other Contracting or third States, agencies of the United Nations and reputable non-governmental organisations (see, among other authorities, NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 119, 17 July 2008). - EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10
SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16
Moreover, where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see, among other authorities, Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 179-80, 24 March 2011; Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, § 113, 3 October 2013; and Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 155, ECHR 2013 (extracts). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16
In respect of Article 13 of the Convention, it cannot, in the light of the Court's aforementioned conclusions concerning the applicants" complaints under Articles 2 and 3, be said that they have an "arguable claim" under those provisions (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; and Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V). - EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16
In respect of Article 13 of the Convention, it cannot, in the light of the Court's aforementioned conclusions concerning the applicants" complaints under Articles 2 and 3, be said that they have an "arguable claim" under those provisions (see, for example, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; and Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V). - EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11
NIZOMKHON DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2017 - 56167/16
Moreover, where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see, among other authorities, Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 179-80, 24 March 2011; Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, § 113, 3 October 2013; and Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 155, ECHR 2013 (extracts).