Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  C.B. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses Witnesses) ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  C.B. v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  C.B. v. Austria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 30465/06

  Bearing in mind that the requirements of paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 of the Convention amount to specific elements of the right to a fair trial guaranteed under paragraph 1 of that Article, the Court will examine the complaints under both provisions taken together (see Brandstetter v. Austria, 28 August 1991, § 42, Series A no. 211, mutatis mutandis, G.B. v. France, cited above, § 57, and Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328/03, § 34, 10 May 2012).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 30465/06

  The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, among many other authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B; G.B. v. France, cited above, § 59, and, more recently, Gregacevic v. Croatia, no. 58331/09, § 63, 10 July 2012).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 30465/06

  Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 44069/98

  G.B. v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 30465/06

  The Court reiterates that the principle of equality of arms - which is one of the elements of the broader concept of fair trial - requires each party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him or her at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his or her opponent (see, among other authorities, G.B. v. France, no. 44069/98, § 58, ECHR 2001-X).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 30465/06

  It is not the Court's role to impose one system over another, but to ensure that the existing system in a given member State provides for sufficient safeguards to guarantee fair proceedings and respect for the equality of arms of the parties involved (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 162, ECHR 2010, with further references).

• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 62162/13

  STRIEDINGER v. AUSTRIA

  The Court's assessment 55. The Court reiterates that the guarantees in paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 of the Convention are specific aspects of the right to a fair hearing set forth in paragraph 1 of this provision; it will therefore consider the applicants" complaints under both provisions taken together (see Brandstetter v. Austria, 28 August 1991, § 42, Series A no. 211; C.B. v. Austria, no. 30465/06, § 38, 4 April 2013; and Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, § 100, ECHR 2015).