Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 44689/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,31177) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAROUGGAS v. GREECE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 44689/16
Therefore, although Contracting States are afforded some discretion as to the manner in which they conform to their obligations under this provision, there must be a domestic remedy allowing the competent national authority both to deal with the substance of the relevant Convention complaint and to grant appropriate relief (see De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 179, ECHR 2017 (extracts)). - EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 26307/95
Entscheidung der Großen Kammer über die an sie nach Art. 43 Europäische …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 44689/16
This will, however, depend on the particular circumstances as to whether the unilateral declaration offers a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention, does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI, and Angelov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 43586/04, § 12, 4 November 2010). - EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 29049/12
STERGIOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 44689/16
Agreements of this nature - giving rise to obligations solely between lawyer and client - cannot bind the Court, which must assess the level of costs and expenses to be awarded with reference not only to whether the costs are actually incurred, but also to whether they have been reasonably incurred (see Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107/96, § 55, ECHR 2000-XI, and Stergiopoulos v. Greece, no. 29049/12, § 63, 7 December 2017). - EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 43586/04
ANGELOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 44689/16
This will, however, depend on the particular circumstances as to whether the unilateral declaration offers a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention, does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, § 75, ECHR 2003-VI, and Angelov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 43586/04, § 12, 4 November 2010).