Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,16798) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZIEMBINSKI v. POLAND (No. 2)
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
- EGMR, 22.11.2017 - 1799/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national court (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, with further references). - EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 39394/98
SCHARSACH ET NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
The Court considers that the applicant is, in principle, entitled to recover any sums that he has paid in fines and costs, by reason of their direct link with the national court judgments which the Court found to be in breach of his right to freedom of expression (see Lingens, cited above, § 50; Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 50, ECHR 2003-XI; Yordanova and Toshev v. Bulgaria, no. 5126/05, § 78, 2 October 2012; and Stankiewicz and Others v. Poland, no. 48723/07, § 87, 14 October 2014). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 101-113, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
21279/02 and 36448/02, § 47, ECHR 2007-IV; Dlugolecki v. Poland, no. 23806/03, § 47, 24 February 2009), the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are factors to be taken into account, because they must not be such as to dissuade the press or others who engage in public debate from taking part in the discussion of matters of legitimate public concern (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 111, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96
CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 1799/07
21279/02 and 36448/02, § 47, ECHR 2007-IV; Dlugolecki v. Poland, no. 23806/03, § 47, 24 February 2009), the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are factors to be taken into account, because they must not be such as to dissuade the press or others who engage in public debate from taking part in the discussion of matters of legitimate public concern (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 111, ECHR 2004-XI).