Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 42472/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,48928) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TKACIK v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 10, Art. 17, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7... Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 42472/98
- EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 42472/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 25.02.1982 - 7511/76
CAMPBELL ET COSANS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 42472/98
Even assuming that domestic remedies were exhausted, the Court finds, on the basis of the documents before it, that the treatment complained of by the applicant did not attain a degree of gravity sufficient to conclude that his right under Article 3 was thereby infringed (see, mutatis mutandis, the Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 February 1982, Series A no. 48, §§ 27 and 28, with further reference). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 42472/98
b) As to the alleged lack of remedies in respect of the remaining complaints, the Court recalls that Article 13 only requires a remedy in domestic law in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in the terms of the Convention (see, for example, the Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 33).