Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55099) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KYSILKOVÁ AND KYSILKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03
The Court reiterates that the right of access to a court is not absolute and may be subject to legitimate restrictions which, however, should not impair the very essence of the right and where it pursued a legitimate aim and there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, e.g., Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, § 57). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03
A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see, for example, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, § 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, § 58). - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03
A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see, for example, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, § 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, § 58). - EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 61811/00
MILATOVÁ AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03
The relevant domestic law concerning the proceedings before the Constitutional Court is set out in the Court's judgment Milatová and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 61811/00, §§ 39-44, ECHR 2005-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 40225/04
FELICIANO BICHAO c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 17273/03
The Court reiterates that the concept of a fair hearing implies the right to adversarial proceedings, according to which the parties must have the opportunity not only to have made known any evidence needed for their claims to succeed, but also to have knowledge of, and comment on, all evidence adduced or observations filed, with a view to influencing the court's decision (see Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, § 24; Milatová and Others, cited above, § 59 ; Spang v. Switzerland, no. 45228/99, § 32, 11 October 2005; Feliciano Bichão v. Portugal, no. 40225/04, § 36, 20 November 2007; and recently, mutatis mutandis, Salduz v. Turkey, [GC], no 36391/02, § 65, ECHR 2008).