Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TINGAROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  TINGAROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 45660/17

  DIMOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  This finding was repeated in the case of Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria ([Committee], nos. 45660/17 and 13 others, 8 June 2021).

  This finding was repeated in the case of Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria ([Committee], nos. 45660/17 and 13 others, 8 June 2021).

• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  This runs counter to the Court's case-law to the effect that the protection of human rights must be practical and effective and not theoretical and illusory, as required by the principle of effectiveness which is inherent in the Convention (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33 and 47-48, Series A no. 37).
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 43572/18

  GRZEDA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  This is because "the finding of a violation" is one of the prerequisites "for affording just satisfaction" and the Court cannot treat them as being on a par (see, similarly, paragraph 7 of the joint partly dissenting opinion that I wrote with Judge Felici in Grzeda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, 15 March 2022).

 
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

  GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  In the leading case in respect of Bulgaria, Kulinski and Sabev, cited above, just as in a number of earlier cases in respect of other countries - such as Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) ([GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005-IX); Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom (nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, ECHR 2010); and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia (nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, 4 July 2013) - the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to the one in the present case.
• EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 14581/20

  KALDA v. ESTONIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  The seriousness of their offences, to which the Government referred, had not been put forward as the reason for their individual disenfranchisement at any time or form at the domestic level and was raised for the first time in the proceedings before the Court (compare, mutatis mutandis, Vlasov and Benyash v. Russia, nos. 51279/09 and 32098, § 36, 20 September 2016, and contrast Kalda v. Estonia (no. 2), no. 14581/20, § 48, 6 December 2022).
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 51279/09

  VLASOV AND BENYASH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  The seriousness of their offences, to which the Government referred, had not been put forward as the reason for their individual disenfranchisement at any time or form at the domestic level and was raised for the first time in the proceedings before the Court (compare, mutatis mutandis, Vlasov and Benyash v. Russia, nos. 51279/09 and 32098, § 36, 20 September 2016, and contrast Kalda v. Estonia (no. 2), no. 14581/20, § 48, 6 December 2022).
• EGMR, 15.02.2022 - 26081/17

  ANATOLIY MARINOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  The applicants base their claim on the recent judgment in the case Anatoliy Marinov v. Bulgaria (no. 26081/17, judgment of 15 February 2022).
• EGMR - 15162/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  In the leading case in respect of Bulgaria, Kulinski and Sabev, cited above, just as in a number of earlier cases in respect of other countries - such as Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) ([GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005-IX); Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom (nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, ECHR 2010); and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia (nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, 4 July 2013) - the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to the one in the present case.
• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63849/09

  KULINSKI AND SABEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 42286/21

  The relevant legal provisions concerning prisoners' right to vote have been set out in the Court's judgment in the case of Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria (no. 63849/09, §§ 10 and 15, 21 July 2016).

• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 33696/19

  PODCHASOV v. RUSSIA

  It will suffice for me to refer to three such opinions criticising this standard manner of rejecting monetary claims in respect of non-pecuniary damage, thereby sparing me the need to reiterate the same arguments again here: see, therefore, paragraphs 3-16 of my partly dissenting opinion in Tingarov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 42286/21, 10 October 2023; paragraphs 22-38 of my partly concurring, partly dissenting opinion in Yüksel Yalçinkaya v. Türkiye [GC], no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023; and paragraphs 4-10 of the joint partly dissenting opinion I authored with Judge Felici in Grzeda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, 15 March 2022.