Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 27189/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,3806) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BRADATEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BRADAÈšEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01
Budweiser-Streit
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 27189/17
The Court therefore finds that the positive obligation of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 has been complied with in the present case, and in the absence of any arbitrariness or manifest unreasonableness, it cannot call into question the findings of the High Court (see, mutatis mutandis, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007-I, and Ali v. Georgia (dec.), no. 41710/05, 12 June 2018). - EuGH, 26.02.2015 - C-143/13
Matei - Richtlinie 93/13/EWG - Missbräuchliche Klauseln in Verträgen zwischen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 27189/17
European Court of Justice case-law 41. The subject matter of alleged unfair terms in loan agreements has been brought before the CJEU many times; for instance, in case C-143/13, following a request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Court of Cluj (Tribunalul Specializat Cluj) in the proceedings in the case of Matei v SC Volksbank Romania SA[1]. - EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 41710/05
ALI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 27189/17
The Court therefore finds that the positive obligation of the State under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 has been complied with in the present case, and in the absence of any arbitrariness or manifest unreasonableness, it cannot call into question the findings of the High Court (see, mutatis mutandis, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007-I, and Ali v. Georgia (dec.), no. 41710/05, 12 June 2018).