Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.H. v. BULGARIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-general;Right to ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  T.N.H. v. BULGARIA

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  It should be noted, in particular, that a school's disciplinary system falls within the ambit of the right to education (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 27, Series A no. 247-C).
• EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80

  VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  That provision complements the other substantive provisions of the Convention and its Protocols; it has effect solely in relation to "the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms" safeguarded by those provisions (see, among other authorities, Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 43, Series A no. 70; Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II; and Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05, § 48, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  The Court's assessment 90. By virtue of the jura novit curia principle the Court is not bound by the legal grounds adduced by the applicant under the Convention and its Protocols, and has the power to decide on the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a complaint by examining it under Articles or provisions of the Convention that are different from those relied upon by the applicant (see, among many other authorities, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018).

 
• EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 59751/15

  G. L. gg. Italien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  The complaint thus falls most naturally to be examined under Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, G.L. v. Italy, no. 59751/15, § 34, 10 September 2020).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 29555/13

  F.O. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  It is also true that under Article 8 of the Convention the national authorities must take steps to ensure zero tolerance to any violence or abuse in educational institutions (see F.O. v. Croatia, no. 29555/13, § 91, 22 April 2021).
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 10465/17

  A.P. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 46519/20

  It is true that the Court has had occasion to note, albeit in different contexts, that a slap on the face administered by a person in authority having control of another - even if an impulsive act carried out in response to an attitude perceived as disrespectful - is unjustified, undermines human dignity and runs counter to Article 3 of the Convention, especially if directed against a minor (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 102-11, ECHR 2015, and A.P. v. Slovakia, no. 10465/17, §§ 55-63, 28 January 2020).