Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  Y.U. v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Y.U. v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 41354/10

  There may be, in addition, positive obligations inherent in an effective "respect" for family life (see Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 41354/10

  In cases where contact and residence disputes concerning children arise between parents and/or other members of the children's family, the Court's case-law has consistently held that this Convention provision includes, among other things, the right for a parent to have measures taken with a view to his or her being reunited with the child, and an obligation on the national authorities to take such measures (see, for example, Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A, and Zawadka v. Poland, no. 48542/99, § 55, 23 June 2005).
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31679/96

  IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 41354/10

  Whilst the national authorities must do their utmost to facilitate such cooperation, any obligation to apply coercion in this area must be limited, since the interests as well as the rights and freedoms of all concerned must be taken into account, as should, more particularly, the best interests of the child and his or her rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see P.P. v. Poland, no. 8677/03, § 82, 8 January 2008; Hokkanen, cited above, § 53; and Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 96, ECHR 2000-I).

• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 59913/11

  ZELENEVY c. RUSSIE

  En statuant sur le problème principal soulevé au regard du droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale, elle considère qu'il ne s'impose pas d'examiner séparément les autres griefs formulés au regard des articles 3, 6 et 13 de la Convention (Y.U. c. Russie, no 41354/10, § 82, 13 novembre 2012, et Amanalachioai c. Roumanie, no 4023/04, § 63, 26 mai 2009).
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 57960/11

  VOROZHBA c. RUSSIE

  Enfin, la Cour rappelle que le caractère adéquat d'une mesure se juge à la rapidité de sa mise en Å“uvre: les procédures relatives à l'attribution de l'autorité parentale, y compris l'exécution de la décision rendue à leur issue, appellent un traitement urgent car le passage du temps peut avoir des conséquences irrémédiables sur les relations entre l'enfant et le parent qui ne vit pas avec lui (Ignaccolo-Zenide, précité, § 102, Y.U. c. Russie, no 41354/10, § 94, 13 novembre 2012, et Maumousseau et Washington, précité, § 83).
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 5504/20

  K.Y. v. RUSSIA

  The general principles on public authorities' positive obligations to ensure the enforcement of contact rights were summarised in Y.U. v. Russia (no. 41354/10, §§ 92-94, 13 November 2012).
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 22076/20

  VYALSHINA v. RUSSIA

  The general principles on public authorities' positive obligations to ensure the enforcement of contact rights were summarised in Y.U. v. Russia (no. 41354/10, §§ 92-94, 13 November 2012).