Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 42058/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,31662) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NEDILENKO AND KOGUT v. UKRAINE
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NEDILENKO AND KOGUT v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99
MIKULIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 42058/08
These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private life even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 23, Series A no. 91; Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, § 33, Reports 1998-I; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I). - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14556/89
PAPAMICHALOPOULOS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 42058/08
In the circumstances of the present case, the Court will examine whether the procedural protection enjoyed by the applicants at the domestic level in respect of their right to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the Convention was practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Turek v. Slovakia, no. 57986/00, § 113, 14 February 2006; and Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260-B, § 42), and consequently compatible with that Article.