Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JANJIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 28971/05

  KUDIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  One of the features of such redress is the amount awarded by the national authorities (see Kudic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 28971/05, § 17, 9 December 2008).
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 38945/05

  PRALICA v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  It must, however, be noted that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or of its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found (see Pralica v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 38945/05, § 19, 27 January 2009, and the authorities citied therein).
• EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 74221/01

  DUBENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  Therefore, they may still claim to be victims within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention in relation to the period during which the judgments remained unenforced (see Dubenko v. Ukraine, no. 74221/01, § 36, 11 January 2005).

 
• EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 337/04

  PEJAKOVIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  Having regard to its finding in the instant case in respect of Mr Nedeljko Brborovic and Mr Milenko Brborovic, and without prejudice to any other measures which may be deemed necessary, the Court considers that the respondent State must secure the enforcement of the final judgment of 5 October 1999 in their favour (see Jelicic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 41183/02, § 53, ECHR 2006-XII, and Pejakovic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 337/04, 36022/04 and 45219/04, § 31, 18 December 2007).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  Furthermore, the Court finds no reasons of a general nature, as defined in Article 37 § 1 in fine, which would require the examination of this part of the application no. 4707/08 by virtue of that Article (contrast Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, §§ 20-28, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 47826/99

  DIREKCI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 29760/06

  It therefore decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in so far as it was brought by Ms Slavojka Kandic (see Erol Direkçi and Ergül Direkçi v. Turkey (dec.), no. 47826/99, 31 March 2005).