Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 45506/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,181) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PECOTOX-AIR S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PECOTOX-AIR S.R.L. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[FRA]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10873/84
TRE TRAKTÖRER AKTIEBOLAG v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 45506/09
The Court reiterates that, according to its case-law, the termination of a valid licence to run a business amounts to an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions guaranteed by Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (Tre Traktörer AB v. Sweden judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 159, § 55, and Rosenzweig and Bonded Warehouses Ltd. v. Poland, no. 51728/99, § 48, 28 July 2005). - EGMR, 21.05.2002 - 28856/95
JOKELA v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 45506/09
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable judicial and administrative procedures (see Capital Bank AD, ibid; Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, p. 21, § 49, Series A no. 296-A; and Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 45506/09
In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable judicial and administrative procedures (see Capital Bank AD, ibid; Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, p. 21, § 49, Series A no. 296-A; and Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00
Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 45506/09
The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be made under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III).