Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,24565) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Art. 2 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99
MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death, or the person or persons responsible, will risk falling foul of this standard (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007). - EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 46748/99
SALGIN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
The Court emphasises that Article 2 requires more than merely informing the next of kin of the progress of the investigation: it includes their active involvement in it (see Salgin v. Turkey, no. 46748/99, § 89, 20 February 2007). - EGMR, 19.03.2002 - 27243/95
SABUKTEKIN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).
- EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02
AL FAYED c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 53489/99
KAVAK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 37393/02
RAJKOWSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death, or the person or persons responsible, will risk falling foul of this standard (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007). - EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
Moreover, substantial delays in involving the next of kin in investigative procedures are not acceptable (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 132, 17 December 2009; and Vasîlca v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69527/10, § 34, 11 February 2014). - EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 69527/10
VASÎLCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13
Moreover, substantial delays in involving the next of kin in investigative procedures are not acceptable (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 132, 17 December 2009; and Vasîlca v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69527/10, § 34, 11 February 2014).
- EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 63789/13
SCRIPNIC c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
En l'espèce, elle note que le montant alloué au titre de préjudice moral est sensiblement inférieur à ce qu'elle octroie généralement dans les affaires moldaves où elle constate la violation du volet procédural de l'article 2 de la Convention (voir, par exemple, Ciobanu c. République de Moldova, no 62578/09, § 44, 24 février 2015, et Lari c. République de Moldova, no 37847/13, § 44, 15 septembre 2015). - EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 20147/15
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. POLAND
The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when a person dies in suspicious circumstances (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 102, 17 December 2009, and Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015). - EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 67351/13
HOVHANNISYAN AND KARAPETYAN v. ARMENIA
This obligation is not confined to cases where it has been established that the death was caused by an agent of the State (see Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015, with further references). - EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09
MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when a person dies in suspicious circumstances (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 102, 17 December 2009, and Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015). - EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 8937/09
GASIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
The same standards also apply to investigations in cases where a person dies in suspicious circumstances in which the State's positive obligation under Article 2 is at stake (see Mikayil Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 4762/05, § 102, 17 December 2009, and Lari v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 37847/13, § 34, 15 September 2015).