Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OLEYNIKOVA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Oleynikova v. Ukraine

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 38765/05

  However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 38765/05

  More specifically, where death occurs in suspicious circumstances leaving room for any allegations of an intentional taking of life, the State must ensure some form of effective official investigation (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Silih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 156-157, 9 April 2009).

• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 17860/17

  GOLOBORODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Decisions refusing to institute proceedings issued without the circumstances of the case having been properly examined (Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, §§ 80-81, 15 December 2011, with further references);.
• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 44244/19

  KENTESH AND BORODYNYA v. UKRAINE

  Ukraine, no. 38765/05,.
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 12991/10

  MANDRYKA v. UKRAINE

  decisions refusing to institute proceedings issued without the circumstances of the case having been properly examined (Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, §§ 80-81, 15 December 2011, with further references),.

 
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 13094/19

  BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  decisions refusing to institute proceedings issued without the circumstances of the case having been properly examined (Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, §§ 80-81, 15 December 2011, with further references),.
• EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 35431/21

  LEZNYUK v. UKRAINE

  decisions refusing to institute proceedings issued without the circumstances of the case having been properly examined (Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, §§ 80-81, 15 December 2011, with further references),.
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 68748/17

  YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  decisions refusing to institute proceedings issued without the circumstances of the case having been properly examined (Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, §§ 80-81, 15 December 2011, with further references),.
• EGMR, 28.01.2016 - 24738/11

  VASYUNETS v. UKRAINE

  The Court has already examined a number of factually similar cases against Ukraine and concluded that such repeated remittal orders disclosed a serious deficiency in the criminal investigation of a case (see, for example, Oleynikova v. Ukraine, no. 38765/05, § 81, 15 December 2011, and Prynda v. Ukraine, no. 10904/05, § 56, 31 July 2012).