Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,234) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASILEVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 40429/14
BOSAK AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18
However, for the reasons elaborated in the case of Bosak and Others v. Croatia (nos. 40429/14 and 3 others, §§ 96, 97, 99 and 100, 6 June 2019, in the context of Article 6 of the Convention), the Court does not consider that the applicant's lawyer's presence at the appellate court hearing meant that the applicant had had a real opportunity to learn about and challenge the prosecutor's arguments, nor that the applicant's failure to raise the non-communication of the prosecutor's submission at that hearing amounted to a non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. - EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 3172/07
LUKAREV v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18
The applicant cannot be considered to have failed to disclose information concerning the very core of the case (compare and contrast Lukarev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 3172/07, §§ 22-26, 15 January 2013). - EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 77805/14
SHIPOVIKJ v. NORTH MACEDONIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18
77805/14 and 77807/14, §§ 33, 35 and 38, 9 March 2021). - EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19
YILMAZ AYDEMIR v. TÜRKIYE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18
The Court considers that this question is closely linked to the substance of the applicant's complaint and must therefore be joined to the merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Yilmaz Aydemir v. Türkiye, no. 61808/19, § 30, 23 May 2023).