Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YILMAZ AYDEMIR v. TÜRKIYE

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AYDEMIR v. TURKEY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR - 34179/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  The Court requires itemised bills and invoices that are sufficiently detailed to enable it to determine to what extent the above requirements have been met (see Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 94, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 59914/16

  NALBANT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  Accordingly, the Court makes no award under this head (see Nalbant and Others v. Turkey, no. 59914/16, § 57, 3 May 2022).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 24479/94

  Recht auf Akteneinsicht bei der Haftprüfung (wesentliche Verfahrensakten; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  In this connection, the proceedings must be adversarial and must always ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person, including offering them the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed by the other party (see Grau?¾inis v. Lithuania, no. 37975/97, § 31, 10 October 2000; Lietzow v. Germany, no. 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; and Lanz v. Austria, no. 24430/94, § 44, 31 January 2002).

 
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  While national law may satisfy this requirement in various ways, whatever method is chosen should ensure that the other party will be aware that observations have been filed and will have a real opportunity to comment on them (see, mutatis mutandis, Brandstetter v. Austria, 28 August 1991, § 67, Series A no. 211, and Lanz, cited above, § 41).
• EGMR, 10.10.2000 - 37975/97

  GRAUZINIS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  In this connection, the proceedings must be adversarial and must always ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person, including offering them the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed by the other party (see Grau?¾inis v. Lithuania, no. 37975/97, § 31, 10 October 2000; Lietzow v. Germany, no. 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; and Lanz v. Austria, no. 24430/94, § 44, 31 January 2002).
• EGMR, 31.01.2002 - 24430/94

  LANZ v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 61808/19

  In this connection, the proceedings must be adversarial and must always ensure "equality of arms" between the parties, the prosecutor and the detained person, including offering them the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed by the other party (see Grau?¾inis v. Lithuania, no. 37975/97, § 31, 10 October 2000; Lietzow v. Germany, no. 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; and Lanz v. Austria, no. 24430/94, § 44, 31 January 2002).

• EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 27509/18

  VASILEVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  The Court considers that this question is closely linked to the substance of the applicant's complaint and must therefore be joined to the merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Yilmaz Aydemir v. Türkiye, no. 61808/19, § 30, 23 May 2023).