Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,37624) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRASSER v. GERMANY
Art. 6 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- BGH, 05.05.1983 - III ZR 177/81
- OLG Saarbrücken, 10.07.1984 - 7 U 144/83
- BGH, 11.07.1985 - III ZR 167/84
- BGH, 22.06.1989 - III ZR 156/86
- BVerfG, 20.07.2000 - 1 BvR 352/00
- LG Karlsruhe, 09.11.2001 - 3 O 192/01
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 66491/01
- EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
- EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 66491/01
- OLG Karlsruhe, 31.07.2007 - 12 U 286/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99
HORVAT v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
However, once this burden of proof has been discharged, it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact exhausted or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see, inter alia, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, § 39, ECHR 2001-VIII; Hartman, cited above, § 58). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 42320/98
BELINGER v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
A remedy which will not bear fruit in sufficient time cannot be regarded as effective (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 22, § 47; Belinger v. Slovenia, no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001). - EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter alia, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII; Hartman, cited above, § 57).
- EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 53341/99
Rechtssache H. gegen TSCHECHISCHE REPUBLIK
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
As regards the first branch of the Government's objection, the Court observes that it could be asked whether, in the light of the recent developments in the Court's case-law (see, in particular, Hartman v. The Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, §§ 67-69, ECHR 2003-VIII), a complaint to the Federal Constitutional Court complaining about the excessive length of civil proceedings can still be regarded as an effective remedy which the applicant had to exhaust. - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
It requires that the complaints intended to be made subsequently to the Court have been made in substance to the appropriate domestic courts (see, inter alia, Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey [GC], judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, pp. 1210 et seq., §§ 66, 69; Thieme v. Germany (dec.), no. 38365/97, 15 November 2001). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 66491/01
A remedy which will not bear fruit in sufficient time cannot be regarded as effective (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 22, § 47; Belinger v. Slovenia, no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001).