Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LÓPEZ RIBALDA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;Non-violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8 - Obligations positives;Article 8-1 - Respect de la ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• anwalt.de (Kurzinformation)

  Zulässigkeit einer heimlichen Videoüberwachung

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 1874/13
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13, 8567/13

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2020, 141
• NZA 2019, 1697

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (13)

• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  In the case of S. and Marper v. United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008), the Court concluded that "detailed rules governing the scope and application of measures" were needed to provide sufficient guarantees against the risk of abuse and arbitrariness.
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  The Court has already held that, in certain circumstances, the fulfilment of positive obligations imposed by Article 8 requires the State to adopt a legislative framework to protect the right at issue (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, §§ 23, 24 and 27, Series A no. 91, and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII, concerning cases of sexual assault on minors; and Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, §§ 102-04, 2 June 2009, as regards medical negligence).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  In the case of S. and Marper v. United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008), the Court concluded that "detailed rules governing the scope and application of measures" were needed to provide sufficient guarantees against the risk of abuse and arbitrariness.

 
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  In both contexts regard must be had in particular to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing private and public interests, subject in any event to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the State (see Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 62, ECHR 2011, and Barbulescu, cited above, § 112).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  The Court should not act as a court of fourth instance and will not therefore question under Article 6 § 1 the judgment of the national courts, unless their findings can be regarded as arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015).
• EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 32200/96

  HERBECQ ET l'ASSOCIATION " LIGUE DES DROITS DE l'HOMME" contre la BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  As to the monitoring of an individual's actions using photographic or video devices, the Convention institutions have taken the view that the monitoring of the actions and movements of an individual in a public place using a camera which did not record the visual data does not constitute in itself a form of interference with private life (see Herbecq and the Association "Ligue des Droits de l"Homme" v. Belgium, nos. 32200/96 and 32201/96, Commission decision of 14 January 1998, Decisions and Reports 92-B, p. 92, and Perry, cited above, § 41).
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 10764/09

  Keine Bedenken gegen Dashcam-Videos vor Gericht?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  Whilst in most cases the right to control such use involves the possibility for an individual to refuse publication of his or her image, it also covers the individual's right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction of the image by another person (see Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, § 40, 15 January 2009, and De La Flor Cabrera v. Spain, no. 10764/09, § 31, 27 May 2014).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 1874/13

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 95, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 420/07

  Vereinbarkeit einer vom Arbeitgeber angeordneten und durch eine Detektei …
• EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98

  SCHÜSSEL v. AUSTRIA

• VG Weimar, 03.08.2022 - 3 K 820/21
  Darüber hinaus sind der Umfang und die Konsequenzen der Überwachung, der Grad der Beeinträchtigung der Privatsphäre sowie mögliche weniger in die Privatsphäre eingreifende Alternativen zu berücksichtigen (vgl. hierzu auch: EGMR, Urteil vom 17. Oktober 2019, Az.: 1874/13 u. 8567/13 - zitiert nach juris).