Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 49226/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,41407) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DE ARRIZ PORRAS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83
SALABIAKU c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 49226/99
Accordingly, as did the French courts in the Salabiaku case, it "inferred from the "fact of possession a presumption which was not subsequently rebutted by any evidence of an event responsibility for which could not be attributed to the perpetrator of the offence or which he would have been unable to avoid"" (see the Salabiaku v. France judgment of 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 30). - EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13191/87
PHAM HOANG c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 49226/99
Put differently, it would seem that the Court of Appeal duly weighed the evidence before it, assessed it carefully and based its findings of guilt on it; it therefore did not automatically rely on any presumptions (see the Pham Hoang v. France judgment of 25 September 1992, Series A no. 243, § 36).