Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAISUEV AND ANZOROV v. GEORGIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on charge) ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04
• EGMR, 10.09.2015 - 39804/04

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  The distinction between a deprivation of, and a restriction upon, liberty is merely one of degree or intensity and not one of nature or substance (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, § 92, and H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 89, ECHR 2004-IX; see also Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, §§ 52-60, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 39692/09

  AUSTIN ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  The distinction between a deprivation of, and a restriction upon, liberty is merely one of degree or intensity and not one of nature or substance (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, § 92, and H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 89, ECHR 2004-IX; see also Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, §§ 52-60, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  By virtue of this provision any person arrested must be told, in simple, non-technical language that he can understand, the essential legal and factual grounds for his arrest, so as to be able, if he sees fit, to apply to a court to challenge its lawfulness (see Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 40, Series A no. 182; see also Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 413, ECHR 2005-III).

 
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 30194/09

  SHIMOVOLOS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  Despite the fact that the applicants were not handcuffed, placed in a locked cell or otherwise restrained during the period in question, it would be unrealistic to assume that they were free to leave (see, for example, Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 50, 21 June 2011, and Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634/04, § 49, 9 November 2010).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  Article 5 of the Convention may apply to deprivations of liberty of even a very short length (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010-... (extracts), where the applicants were stopped for a search which did not exceed thirty minutes; see also Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, § 71, 22 May 2008, and Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940/95, § 75, 24 June 2008).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 4634/04

  OSYPENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 39804/04

  Despite the fact that the applicants were not handcuffed, placed in a locked cell or otherwise restrained during the period in question, it would be unrealistic to assume that they were free to leave (see, for example, Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 50, 21 June 2011, and Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634/04, § 49, 9 November 2010).

• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 8933/05

  TOMASZEWSCY c. POLOGNE

  Cette disposition ne traite pas des autres voies de recours pouvant permettre de vérifier la légalité d'une détention qui a déjà pris fin, en particulier d'une détention brève comme celle en cause ici (voir, Slivenko c. Lettonie [GC], no 48321/99, § 158, Recueil 2003-X, Baisuiev et Anzorov c. Georgie, no 39804/04, § 69, 18 décembre 2012).