Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VELESCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  VELESCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [FRA]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death, or the person or persons responsible, will risk falling foul of this standard (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007).
• EGMR, 19.03.2002 - 27243/95

  SABUKTEKIN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II; Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02

  AL FAYED c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II; Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).

 
• EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 53489/99

  KAVAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II; Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 37393/02

  RAJKOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of death, or the person or persons responsible, will risk falling foul of this standard (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007).
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 69527/10

  VASÎLCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  The Court has stressed on many occasions that the involvement of the next-of-kin serves to ensure public accountability of the authorities and public scrutiny of their actions in such situations (see Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 321, ECHR 2007-II, and Vasîlca v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 69527/10, § 34, 11 February 2014), to the extent necessary to safeguard the person's legitimate interests.