Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PASTOR AND TICLETE v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06

  A complaint is characterised by the matters alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on (see, mutatis mutandis, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 13, § 29; Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 223, § 44; Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 167, 1 March 2001; and Eugenia Lazar v. Romania, no. 32146/05, § 60, 16 February 2010).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06

  The Court reiterates that where there may be obstacles or difficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities is vital in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 72, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06

  Moreover, according to the principles set out by the Court in the case of Blecic v. Croatia ([GC], no. 59532/00, §§ 63-69, ECHR 2006-III), the obligation under the Convention of the Romanian authorities to conduct a prompt and effective investigation is derived from the aforementioned unlawful acts and cannot be severed or examined separately by the Court.
• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 46430/99

  BARBU ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06

  The Court also notes that at the pre-trial stage of the proceedings the criminal investigation was carried out by military prosecutors, who were military personnel under the same chain of command as the military officers they were investigating for the violent crushing of the demonstration of December 1989 (see, mutatis mutandis, Güleç v. Turkey, judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, §§ 81-82; ÖÄ?ur v. Turkey, [GC] no. 21954/93, ECHR 1999-III, §§ 91-92; Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004; and Sandru and Others, cited above, § 74).

• EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09

  MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  30911/06 and 40967/06, § 58, 19 April 2011).