Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 42666/10, 61523/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,51731) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HAVELKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 42666/10
The longer the proceedings as a whole or at one particular level of jurisdiction, the more pressing the obligation on the court to take steps to expedite or conclude them (see, among many other authorities, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 65, ECHR 2006-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 19753/92
CIRICOSTA AND VIOLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 42666/10
Therefore the Court has held that even proceedings lasting more than fifteen years might not violate the "reasonable time" requirement had the delays been caused by the applicant (see Ciricosta and Viola v. Italy, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 337-A). - EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 42538/02
KAZMIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 42666/10
In particular, only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see Koktavá v. the Czech Republic, no. 45107/98, § 48, 2 December 2003; Kazmin v. Russia, no. 42538/02, §§ 83-89, 13 January 2011).
- EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 2945/16
KHLEBIK v. UKRAINE
Likewise, in view of the variety of types of proceedings, there are no absolute criteria for determining the point at which the length of proceedings becomes excessive (see Havelka v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42666/10 and 61523/10, 20 September 2011).