Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07, 15276/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57273) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DOBRIC v. SERBIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97
GARCÍA MANIBARDO c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07
Being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of any case before it, the Court considers that the above complaints fall to be examined under Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention only (see Akdeniz v. Turkey, no. 25165/94, § 88, 31 May 2005, and García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II).In the case of Garcia Manibardo v. Spain (no. 38695/97, § 45, ECHR 2000-II) the Court articulated the principle that a disproportionate hindrance of the right of access to a court is in breach of Article 6 of the Convention.
- EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07
In the Court's view, although the Government have not raised an objection as to the Court's competence ratione temporis, this issue nevertheless calls for its consideration (see, mutatis mutandis, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 25165/94
AKDENIZ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07
Being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of any case before it, the Court considers that the above complaints fall to be examined under Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention only (see Akdeniz v. Turkey, no. 25165/94, § 88, 31 May 2005, and García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II). - EGMR, 21.11.2002 - 36747/02
ARSLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 2611/07
In the absence of explanations of an interval, of at least several days, between the date on which the initial submission was written and the date on which it was posted, the latter is to be considered the date of introduction of an application (see Arslan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36747/02, decision of 21 November 2002, ECHR 2002-X (extracts)).