Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,53220) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZHOVTAN v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02
The Court notes that in the present case the domestic proceedings had achieved both the identification and punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment (compare and contrast, inter alia, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV) and the payment of compensation to the applicant (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 48, 30 September 2004). - EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 35091/02
MIKHAÏLENKI ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02
In this respect the Court recalls its established case law that the claim for damages against the Bailiffs" Service cannot be considered an effective remedy where the delay in the enforcement of the judgments was due to reasons beyond the Bailiffs" control (see, among many others, Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02, and the following, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 17044/02
The Court notes that in the present case the domestic proceedings had achieved both the identification and punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment (compare and contrast, inter alia, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-IV) and the payment of compensation to the applicant (see Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 48, 30 September 2004).