Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 30906/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,21541) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GAZIZOV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Defence through legal assistance) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
IDALOV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 30906/06
For a waiver to be effective it must be shown that the applicant could reasonably have foreseen the consequences of his conduct (see Sejdovic, cited above, § 87; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 173, 22 May 2012; and Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30900/02, 9 September 2003). - EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 53203/99
VANYAN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 30906/06
However, the personal attendance of the defendant does not take on the same crucial significance for an appeal hearing as it does for the trial hearing even where an appellate court has full jurisdiction to review the case on questions both of fact and law (see Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 60, ECHR 2006-XII, and Vanyan v. Russia, no. 53203/99, § 60, 15 December 2005). - EGMR, 09.09.2003 - 30900/02
JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 30906/06
For a waiver to be effective it must be shown that the applicant could reasonably have foreseen the consequences of his conduct (see Sejdovic, cited above, § 87; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 173, 22 May 2012; and Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30900/02, 9 September 2003).