Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MYSLIHAKA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  No violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MYSLIHAKA v. ALBANIA

  Art. 13Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 09.04.2002 - 46726/99

  PODKOLZINA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  A wide range of purposes may therefore be compatible with that provision (see, for example, Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 34, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR - 15162/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In the latter case, it will be for the legislature itself to balance the competing interests in order to avoid any general, automatic and indiscriminate restriction (see Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, § 107, 4 July 2013, and Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 63849/09, § 37, 21 July 2016).
• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63849/09

  KULINSKI AND SABEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In the latter case, it will be for the legislature itself to balance the competing interests in order to avoid any general, automatic and indiscriminate restriction (see Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, § 107, 4 July 2013, and Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 63849/09, § 37, 21 July 2016).

 
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In response to the Government's objections, the Court reiterates that in order to lodge an application under Article 34 of the Convention, an individual must be able to show that he or she was "directly affected" by the measure complained of (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93 § 52, ECHR 2000-VII; Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008; and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  The Court has repeatedly affirmed that the margin in this area is wide (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt, cited above, § 52; Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 63, ECHR 1999-I; and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  It reiterates, in particular, that Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention guarantees subjective rights, including the right to vote and to stand for election (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 46-51, Series A no. 113).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In response to the Government's objections, the Court reiterates that in order to lodge an application under Article 34 of the Convention, an individual must be able to show that he or she was "directly affected" by the measure complained of (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93 § 52, ECHR 2000-VII; Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008; and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 26.09.2000 - 33933/96

  GUISSET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  An applicant may lose his or her victim status if two conditions are met: first, the authorities should acknowledge the alleged violations either expressly or in substance and, second, they should afford redress (see Guisset v. France, no. 33933/96, § 66, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 6033/13

  A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In response to the Government's argument that the applicants could have instituted judicial proceedings in the domestic courts, the Court reiterates that domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see A.H. and Others v. Russia, nos. 6033/13 and 15 others, § 347, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 12626/13

  MCLEAN AND COLE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 68958/17

  In other similar applications the Court has concluded that applicants must lodge complaints with it about their inability to vote in specific elections within six months from the dates of the elections (see McLean and Cole v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 12626/13, §§ 25 and 37, 11 June 2013, and Dunn v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 566/10

  DUNN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM