Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,7814) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZEMZAMI v. ITALY
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ZEMZAMI v. ITALY
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has also established its practice concerning the procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of a detainee (see, among many other authorities, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002-II; Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, 17 October 2013; and Volk, cited above). - EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 33834/03
RIVIERE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
Moreover, the Court has established its practice, in connection with Article 3 of the Convention, regarding the treatment of mental health issues suffered by detainees (see, for example, S?‚awomir Musia?‚ v. Poland, no. 28300/06, 20 January 2009; Rivière v. France, no. 33834/03, 11 July 2006; Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, 31 January 2019; and Jeanty v. Belgium, no. 82284/17, 31 March 2020). - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 57671/00
SLIMANI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has also established its practice concerning the procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of a detainee (see, among many other authorities, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, ECHR 2002-II; Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, 17 October 2013; and Volk, cited above).
- EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 23405/16
S.F. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above). - EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 28300/06
SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
Moreover, the Court has established its practice, in connection with Article 3 of the Convention, regarding the treatment of mental health issues suffered by detainees (see, for example, S?‚awomir Musia?‚ v. Poland, no. 28300/06, 20 January 2009; Rivière v. France, no. 33834/03, 11 July 2006; Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, 31 January 2019; and Jeanty v. Belgium, no. 82284/17, 31 March 2020). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99
TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above). - EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 82284/17
JEANTY c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
Moreover, the Court has established its practice, in connection with Article 3 of the Convention, regarding the treatment of mental health issues suffered by detainees (see, for example, S?‚awomir Musia?‚ v. Poland, no. 28300/06, 20 January 2009; Rivière v. France, no. 33834/03, 11 July 2006; Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, 31 January 2019; and Jeanty v. Belgium, no. 82284/17, 31 March 2020). - EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 38447/09
KETREB c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above). - EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 31963/08
MITIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above). - EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 62120/09
VOLK v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 13015/20
The Court has established in a number of cases, including one brought against Italy, its practice concerning the positive obligations under Article 2 to protect an individual from self-harm in detention (see, for example, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III; Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005; Renolde v. France, no. 5608/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Ketreb v. France, no. 38447/09, 19 July 2012; Volk v. Slovenia, no. 62120/09, 13 December 2012; Mitic v. Serbia, no. 31963/08, 22 January 2013; Isenc v. France, no. 58828/13, 4 February 2016; S.F. v. Switzerland, no. 23405/16, § 98, 30 June 2020; and Citraro and Molino, cited above).