Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.09.2004 - 63994/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,44479) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ESTOK v. SLOVAKIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2004 - 63994/00
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see, among other authorities, Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
- EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3305/04
VICANOVA v. SLOVAKIA
The Court recalls in this connection that constitutional remedies available for length of proceedings complaints in Slovakia prior to 1 January 2002 were not considered effective in the Convention sense (see Estok v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 63994/00, 28 September 2004). - EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 9545/02
RUTTKAY AND RUTTKAYOVA v. SLOVAKIA
The Court however finds no grounds for an assumption that, in this context, the level of just satisfaction awards by the Constitutional Court is generally insufficient (see Sirancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004, Estok v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 63994/00, 28 September 2004, Dubjaková, cited above and Bako v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 60227/00, 15 March 2005).