Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,35571) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NOVAYA GAZETA AND BORODYANSKIY v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NOVAYA GAZETA AND BORODYANSKIY v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR - 28473/12 (anhängig)
KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
The Court is mindful of the fundamentally subsidiary role of the Convention system (see Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, § 175, ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
Seen in the context of the essential role of a free press in ensuring the proper functioning of a democratic society (see, among many other authorities, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV), the alleged violation of Article 10 of the Convention in the present case concerns, in the Court's view, "important questions of principle". - EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05
KOROLEV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
A violation of the Convention may concern important questions of principle and thus cause a significant disadvantage regardless of pecuniary interest (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-V).
- EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12
Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
The Court sees no reason to assume that the appeal proceedings would have taken a different course had the applicant company and the second applicant lodged separate appeals against the default judgment (see, mutatis mutandis, Mariya Alekhina and Others v. Russia, no. 38004/12, § 247, 17 July 2018). - EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 27329/06
ROSIIANU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
The Court reiterates the key importance of freedom of expression as one of the preconditions for a functioning democracy (see Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, § 39, ECHR 2003-VI, and Rosiianu v. Romania, no. 27329/06, § 56, 24 June 2014). - EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 19219/07
SYLKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
This scrutiny should encompass, among other things, such elements as contribution to a debate of general interest and whether a case involves the press or other news media (see, with further references, Sylka v. Poland (dec.), no. 19219/07, § 28, 3 June 2014). - EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 24014/07
SKUDAYEVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
The Court further notes that the interference must be seen in the context of the essential role of a free press in ensuring the proper functioning of a democratic society (see, among many other authorities, Skudayeva v. Russia, no. 24014/07, § 30, 5 March 2019; see also paragraph 39 above). - EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 300/11
C.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 42113/09
The subjective perception must be justified on objective grounds (see, with further references, C.P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 300/11, § 42, 6 September 2016).