Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 77546/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,57213) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VERMEULEN and OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 77546/01
As regards the applicants" claim to the contrary, namely that the Supreme Court had not taken their replies into consideration, the Government referred to the Court's case-law according to which, firstly, the obligation under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for courts to give reasons for their decisions cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument and, secondly, an appellate court, when dismissing an appeal, may, in principle, simply endorse the reasons in the lower court's decision (see Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, § 61, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 12005/86
BORGERS v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 77546/01
After the Court's judgment in the case of Borgers v. Belgium (judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 214-B) the Code of Criminal Procedure (Wetboek van Strafvordering) was amended.