Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MANCHEVA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.12.2002 - 39609/98
• EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 39609/98
• EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 39609/98

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 39609/98

  The Court reiterates that Article 41 of the Convention does not require applicants to exhaust domestic remedies a second time in order to obtain just satisfaction if they have already done so in vain in respect of their substantive complaints (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 172, ECHR 2002-IV).

• EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 35355/08

  VELCHEVA v. BULGARIA

  Referring to a number of cases decided by the Court, such as Mutishev and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 18967/03, 3 December 2009), Mancheva v. Bulgaria (no. 39609/98, 30 September 2004), and Ryabykh v. Russia (no. 52854/99, ECHR 2003-IX), the applicant pointed out that the principle of legal certainty required compliance with final court judgments.
• EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 5516/05

  NEDELCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  In that case the Court reiterated that the principle of legal certainty required, inter alia, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question, save for reasons of a substantial and compelling character (see also, mutatis mutandis, Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX; and Mancheva v. Bulgaria, no. 39609/98, § 59, 30 September 2004).
• EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 36823/07

  TSENOVI v. BULGARIA

  The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Bulgaria, its practice concerning complaints about the non-execution of a final judgment and about one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III; Mancheva v. Bulgaria, no. 39609/98, §§ 54-68, 30 September 2004; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, §§ 69-92, 23 September 2004).