Rechtsprechung
EGMR - 19457/22 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
?žEN v. TÜRKIYE
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04
S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
Auszug aus EGMR - 19457/22
Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the taking and retention of his fingerprints and photograph (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 66-67, 78-86 and 101-104, ECHR 2008, and M.K. v. France, no. 19522/09, §§ 29-47, 18 April 2013; see also Uçkan v. Türkiye [Committee], no. 67657/17, §§ 15-30, 18 April 2023)?. - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
Auszug aus EGMR - 19457/22
Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the taking and retention of his fingerprints and photograph (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 66-67, 78-86 and 101-104, ECHR 2008, and M.K. v. France, no. 19522/09, §§ 29-47, 18 April 2013; see also Uçkan v. Türkiye [Committee], no. 67657/17, §§ 15-30, 18 April 2023)?. - EGMR, 18.04.2023 - 67657/17
UÇKAN c. TÜRKIYE
Auszug aus EGMR - 19457/22
Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the taking and retention of his fingerprints and photograph (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 66-67, 78-86 and 101-104, ECHR 2008, and M.K. v. France, no. 19522/09, §§ 29-47, 18 April 2013; see also Uçkan v. Türkiye [Committee], no. 67657/17, §§ 15-30, 18 April 2023)?. - EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 41394/15
PAUN JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 19457/22
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in the context of the individual application he had lodged with the Constitutional Court? In particular, did the Constitutional Court's decision of 29 July 2022 contain adequate reasoning with respect to the applicant's main complaint concerning the taking and retention of his personal data (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I, and Paun Jovanovic v. Serbia, no. 41394/15, §§ 100-101 and 108-109, 7 February 2023)?. - EGMR - 1935/23 (anhängig)
IMREK v. TÜRKIYE
Auszug aus EGMR - 19457/22
Application no. 1935/23 Ender IMREK against Türkiye lodged on 2 December 2022 communicated on 12 January 2024.