Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MACAGNINO v. ITALY and 1 other application

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 36862/05

  GOGITIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  (a) whether the nature and severity of the crimes on which the declaration of social dangerousness of G.R. has been grounded justified the presumption that the applicants' assets were proceeds of unlawful activities (compare Bongiorno and Others v. Italy, no. 4514/07, § 45, 5 January 2010, Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, § 107, 12 May 2015, and Telbis and Viziteu v. Romania, no. 47911/15, §§ 74 and 77, 26 June 2018);.
• EGMR, 21.04.2016 - 46577/15

  IVANOVA AND CHERKEZOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  Has there been an interference with the applicants' right to respect for home guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the fact that the house which constituted their domicile was confiscated? If so, was the interference in accordance with the law, necessary in a democratic society and proportionate to the aim pursued (see Aboufadda v. France (dec.), no. 28457/10, § 43, 4 November 2014, and, mutatis mutandis, Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, §§ 53-56, 21 April 2016)?.
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 50705/11

  TODOROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  (b) whether national authorities showed in a reasonable manner, by providing at least some particulars in the light of the available evidence, that each one of the confiscated assets had been unlawfully obtained (see, mutatis mutandis, Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 50705/11 and 6 others, §§ 212 and 215, 13 July 2021);.

 
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 36889/18

  CAMELIA BOGDAN c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  (d) whether the applicants faced difficulties meeting their burden of proof due to the lengthy period over which their income and expenses were examined, and the fact that they were requested to prove the lawful origin of their assets more than 20 years after those assets had been purchased (see Todorov and Others, cited above, §§ 205 and 210, Dimitrovi, cited above, § 46, and, mutatis mutandis, Camelia Bogdan v. Romania, no. 36889/18, § 38, 20 October 2020);.
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 28457/10

  ABOUFADDA c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  Has there been an interference with the applicants' right to respect for home guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the fact that the house which constituted their domicile was confiscated? If so, was the interference in accordance with the law, necessary in a democratic society and proportionate to the aim pursued (see Aboufadda v. France (dec.), no. 28457/10, § 43, 4 November 2014, and, mutatis mutandis, Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577/15, §§ 53-56, 21 April 2016)?.
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 4514/07

  BONGIORNO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  (a) whether the nature and severity of the crimes on which the declaration of social dangerousness of G.R. has been grounded justified the presumption that the applicants' assets were proceeds of unlawful activities (compare Bongiorno and Others v. Italy, no. 4514/07, § 45, 5 January 2010, Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, § 107, 12 May 2015, and Telbis and Viziteu v. Romania, no. 47911/15, §§ 74 and 77, 26 June 2018);.
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 47911/15

  TELBIS AND VIZITEU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 61799/15

  (a) whether the nature and severity of the crimes on which the declaration of social dangerousness of G.R. has been grounded justified the presumption that the applicants' assets were proceeds of unlawful activities (compare Bongiorno and Others v. Italy, no. 4514/07, § 45, 5 January 2010, Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, § 107, 12 May 2015, and Telbis and Viziteu v. Romania, no. 47911/15, §§ 74 and 77, 26 June 2018);.